Canon-ef-100mm-f-2-8l-macro-is-usm.3496777
9.9 de 10

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

Opiniones para Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

Mostrando 1-5 de 5
Global 4
4.0

not so great

Bill, B&H Photo
29 Diciembre 2013
  • Extracto: After all the great reviews for this lens I expected much more. I compared it to my Hoya close -lenses. The Canon 100mm f2.8 IS was only slightly more sharp. What really surprised me was how dark it was for a f2.8 lens. In my comparison test, the Hoya close-up lens was much brighter.
  • Leer la Opinión completa Translate to español
Global 4
4.0

Not sure I like this Lens

Cgil, Adorama
16 Abril 2010
  • Extracto: I bought this lens for taking macro photographs of fauna and flora, portraits and some commercial products. After using it for a little over a month I'm not exactly sure I like this lens. Here is why. First the focus is slow on FULL, I found it easier to use a manual focus, not good if photographing bugs. The macro shots I took of a tulip didn't come out with a crisp focus I was hoping for. Pictures of a spring up close did come out nicely though.
  • A favor: Easily Interchangeable
  • Contras: Blurry Focus, Slow Focus
  • Leer la Opinión completa Translate to español
Global 4
4.0

pretty noisy!

Peter, B&H Photo
12 Abril 2010
  • Extracto: I only took a dozen of so test shots with this lens. Auto-focus basically sounded like a muffled steel trash can rolling down the driveway. I have already returned it [...]. I'll probably get a 180mm instead.
  • A favor: Rugged, Strong Construction
  • Contras: Slow Focus
  • Leer la Opinión completa Translate to español
Global 4
4.0

Canon 100mm 2.8L macro IS lens

By Chip, PriceGrabber
8 Noviembre 2009
  • Extracto: This lens is nowhere as sharp as the Nikon 105mm 2.8 VR micro lens. I know because I also have that lens.
  • A favor: light weight, IS helps
  • Contras: all plastic lens. pricey. not very sharp
  • Leer la Opinión completa Translate to español
Global 4
4.0

Opinión del Usuario

JTS0719, Fredmiranda
24 Octubre 2009
  • Conclusión: I either have a bad copy or it's not nearly as sharp as the non-IS version. I'm sending it back to the store and will try and get a replacement.
  • A favor: Better built than the non IS version
  • Contras: not as sharp as the non-IS version
  • Leer la Opinión completa Translate to español